The Union is concerned to see a deal of both misinformed and misleading information being circulated on this matter.

1. The Working Party established to look at the T.E.P. issue has not reached an agreed position. Its report when released will show agreement on all issues except the one-off access to a T.E.P. for those employed at 1996 who did not have this option given to them.

2. The Union’s position regarding T.E.Ps is clear and unambiguous. Successive Union Conferences have firstly established and reconfirmed a Union Policy opposing T.E.Ps. The Union’s position is therefore simply put as, if you want to receive the Employer’s Superannuation subsidy, you must be a member of the Superannuation Scheme.

All Union officials are bound by Conference decisions. Union officials have no ability to unilaterally vary Conference established Policy.

3. On the integration of CSTs in 2001, the Employment Agreement that effected this was ratified by the membership overwhelmingly.

This Collective Agreement contained the “grand-fathering” provision that permitted ex CSTs who were receiving a T.E.P. to continue receiving one.

This aspect of the proposed settlement was no secret. The Union Newsletter that detailed the proposed settlement explicitly outlined this aspect of the settlement.

The proposed settlement of 2003 was again overwhelmingly ratified by the membership and included a continuation of this “grand-fathering” provision.

Whatever “discrimination” currently occurs therefore is not the result of any negotiation, but is the outcome of ratification meetings of members. A vote of the membership is the only policy-making forum that is superior to Conference decisions.

4. The issue that is being re-raised – that of claimed discrimination – has previously been argued before the Employment Relations Authority. In a decision in February 2004, the Authority rejected that claim.

5. The timeframe for appealing that decision has now well expired. A copy of that decision is attached.

6. Any re-raising of the issue would be through normal employment law processes i.e. Mediation, Employment Relations Authority, Employment Court, Court of Appeal.

7. Any implementation of any changes, whatever they may be, to the present arrangements regarding the provision of T.E.Ps, will require ratification by Union members.

8. The anomaly created in 1996 was not created by the Union. The Union was not involved at all.

9. It is also unfortunate that there are a few members who, for whatever reason, decided themselves not to join the Superannuation Scheme.

That they now find themselves comparing their circumstances with members who have $200,000 in a Superannuation Account and they have nothing, is solely a matter for their own reflection.

DOWNLOAD FILE DOWNLOAD FILE

Related Articles

VIEW ALL VIEW ALL

Breaking News

Tamaki Makaurau Flooding, State of Local Civil Defence Emergency

Last nights unprecedented weather event caused widespread havoc across the region with Fire and Emergency career and volunteer crews, operational support and 111 emergency dispatchers working to exhaustion, with all available FENZ resources at times being mobilised to incidents right across the region.


Season’s Greetings and Office Hours

The Auckland Local wishes all members a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. The Auckland Office will be closed from the afternoon of Friday 23 December 2022, reopening on Monday 9 January 2023.


Ratification Meeting next Tuesday 13th Dec at 5pm

As you will be well aware by now, we have finally reached an agreed term of settlement in the negotiation for a new CEA. The NZPFU is recommending members accept it and ratify the settlement offer. The National Committee has completely wrung out the sponge for every possible drop of benefit to members, and it's now our turn to act.